After a short Christmas and New Year’s break, we’re back into safe withdrawal rates!
All the work that we have conducted so far has defined a successful retirement portfolio as a portfolio that has does not run out of money during retirement. So we calculated the safe withdrawal rate that would completely deplete the portfolio at the last day of retirement.
But, practically speaking, this would be a scary ride for many retirees. There would be a number of close calls in which the portfolio balance fell very close to zero but did not technically fail. In these cases, it’s not hard to imagine that a retiree would do something drastic, like an undignified return to work in their 70s or 80s.
Should that portfolio be considered safe? It may not have run out of money but it wasn’t a comfortable ride into retirement. A cushion would be nice.
Moreover, I’d guess that many retirees don’t want to end retirement with very little money. Surely most people want to bequest something to their family or favourite charity.
It seems that we could make a fair argument that most people want some balance left in their portfolio at the end of retirement. So in this article we examine the effect of the target final portfolio balance on safe withdrawal rates.
In part 3 of our Safe Withdrawal Rate Series we set out to determine the optimal mix of Australian equities and Australian bonds that would allow us to withdraw the most from our retirement portfolios without running out of money.
We found that we could safely withdraw 4.00% of our retirement balance per year (adjusted for inflation) as long as the portfolios had at least 75% Australian equities.
We also noticed that portfolios with 75% equities and 25% bonds actually performed better than a 100% equities portfolio. This was our first indication that diversification can be beneficial, even if we diversify into a lower return asset.
Then in part 4 of the series, we extended our analysis to determine whether international exposure would be better for Australian retirees. We found that we can safely withdraw more when Aussie retirement portfolios were made up of Australian equities, U.S. equities and U.S. bonds. We don’t even need to buy Australian bonds!
One conscious limitation of all that previous analysis is that we assumed a 30 year retirement length. However, in reality many early retirees may be retired for 40, 50 or even 60 years. So in this article we will examine the effect of longer retirement lengths on safe withdrawal rates.
In Part 3 of our Safe Withdrawal Rate series we determined the best mix of Australian equities and bonds to maximise the chance of a retirement portfolio lasting 30 years. We discovered that a mix of 75% Australian equities and 25% Australian bond was optimal.
But in reality, most of us Aussies invest in a mix of Australian and U.S. markets (and possibly some ‘whole of world’ markets).
So in this article, we are going to extend our previous analysis to look at an internationally diversified portfolio. We are going to determine how we should allocate our retirement portfolio across Australian equities, Australian bonds, U.S. equities and U.S. bonds.
Last month I showed you how the share market really hurt my progress. I barely added to my net income, despite saving quite a bit of money.
My focus for this month was to get back on track and grow my net worth as much as possible. And despite every house bill known to man hitting me this month, I was able to do it with a little help from my friend ‘airline compensation income’.
Sometimes bad events (like a cancelled flight) have silver linings (free money). Let me tell you what happened…
If you’ve spent any time in the financial independence community, then no doubt you’ve come across the 4% rule. The rule states that you can withdraw 4% of your retirement portfolio (adjusted for inflation) without running out of money. As such, 4% is known as the safe withdrawal rate.
If you play through the mathematics, the implication of the 4% rule is that you need 25x your annual expenses to retire. So many would-be early retirees structure their entire retirement plan around that 25x expenses number.
More recent studies have questioned the robustness of the 4% rule for U.S. markets. Amongst other things, they have found that 4% very quickly turns into 3.5% or below when you change equity/bond portfolio mix, retirement length and other factors.
But all of this work was done for Americans using U.S. markets data. The question for us Aussies is: Does any of this apply to us? If so, which parts?
In this article we begin to clarify some of the important — but still unanswered — questions about the 4% rule for Australians. We test whether the basic 4% rule applies to Australians and whether it needs to be adjusted for different portfolio mixes.
In future articles in this series we will elaborate on these findings and test follow-on questions, such as ‘what is the effect of retirement length of safe withdrawal rates?’, ‘can we improve safe withdrawal rates by mixing Australian and international investments?’, and more!
Ever heard of the phrase “garbage in, garbage out”? It’s the idea that no matter how good the analysis is, if the data is wrong then the results will be wrong too.
The challenge with safe withdrawal rates is that you need historical data to run the calculations. And historical data, particularly early data from the late 1800s and early 1900s, is notoriously difficult to find. So before I dive into the deep, dark chasm that is safe withdrawal rate calculation, I’m going to spend some time ensuring that I’m using solid data.
Apologies in advance. This is going to be a dull article for those of you who aren’t interested in validating data sources. But it’s a necessary evil.
Last month I talked about how things were falling into place and I was finding it easy to grow my wealth. I spoke to soon. This month was tough.
It was my first experience of the share market correcting; it lost something like 10% of its value during the month. It really hit my investment account and funds in my super. At the same time, I had a number of unique circumstances in October that resulted in quite a bit of additional spending.
Together, this all really took a hit on my net worth. Let’s see how much….
The fundamental question that people have about early retirement is: how much do I need to save to retire?
For those who understand the mathematics behind early retirement, the main thing that determines how big our retirement portfolio must be is the safe withdrawal rate.
Essentially, safe withdrawal rate is the amount of money you can withdraw from your portfolio when you are retired without running out of money.
I stumbled upon an amazing 28 part series on Early Retirement Now that calculates safe withdrawal rates for U.S. markets. It calculates safe withdrawal rates for different retirement lengths, asset allocation, and more!
However, there are major differences between U.S. and Australian markets that mean each would likely have different safe withdrawal rates.
It’s not fair that our U.S. friends have such great data on their required retirement portfolio and we don’t. So in the next few posts, I plan to replicate some of the analysis on Early Retirement Now — with Australian data, for Australians.
I’ve reached my third month of recording my income, expenses and net worth. This month I noticed that my spending was so-so. I neither blew my budget, nor turned into a super frugal saving machine.
In a way, I guess this is how things are supposed to be. I’m starting to turn sensible spending behaviours into a way of life. It’s not a sacrifice, it’s just how I spend my money!
And despite not feeling overly satisfied about my spending habits this month, I was still able to grow my net worth more than previous months.
Things just seem to be falling into place, let’s see how that happened…
I’m sure that I’m not the only person that wanted to learn more about the Australian share market, opened up Google, and got smacked in the face with jargon and technical terms.
But why? Surely the fundamentals of investing can’t be that hard to understand.
The cynic in me says that finance professionals like to make the easy sound complex to keep themselves sounding smart in their suits.
Either way, I decided to spend some time explaining the basics of the sharemarket. From ‘what is a share’ to ‘what does an index measure’ to ‘how do unfranked and franked dividends work?’.
This article goes out to anybody who’s had an embarrassingly stupid share market question but was too afraid to ask.